<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tech Break &#187; cell phones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minesblog.com/techbreak/tag/cell-phones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minesblog.com/techbreak</link>
	<description>the tech talk's here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:43:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GSM Hacked&#8230;Go 3G or get snooped</title>
		<link>http://minesblog.com/techbreak/2009/09/15/gsm-hacked-go-3g-or-get-snooped/</link>
		<comments>http://minesblog.com/techbreak/2009/09/15/gsm-hacked-go-3g-or-get-snooped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Littman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SecurityNow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minesblog.com/techbreak/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So today while I was scanning the 1913 Prospector (here&#8217;s the 1914 one) I listened to the latest episode of Security Now, a favorite podcast of mine that I haven&#8217;t heard in a long while. The crux of this week&#8217;s &#8216;cast: GSM, the voice and data standard used the world over for mobile phones, is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So today while I was scanning the 1913 Prospector (<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/19748146/The-Prospector-1914">here&#8217;s the 1914 one</a>) I listened to the <a href="http://twit.tv/sn213">latest episode</a> of <a href="http://twit.tv/sn">Security Now</a>, a favorite podcast of mine that I haven&#8217;t heard in a long while.</p>
<p>The crux of this week&#8217;s &#8216;cast: GSM, the voice and data standard used the world over for mobile phones, is hopelessly flawed in a security sense and can be cracked in several different ways. The cost for the correct apparatus to crack the encryption: just a few thousand dollars. The expertise required: minimal. <a href="http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-213.htm">Read for yourself.</a> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/mobility/security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206800800&amp;cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All">Or here.</a></p>
<p>Granted, you <em>probably</em> won&#8217;t get your conversations spied upon, unless some enterprising Mines student with a wad of cash has nothing better to do and your T-Mobile or AT&amp;T phone is not running in 3G mode at the time (though the latter can be forced). Still, it&#8217;s best <em>not</em> to have sensitive conversations over your non-3G phone (which includes the first-generation iPhone) if that non-3G phone is running off of AT&amp;T or T-Mobile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://minesblog.com/techbreak/2009/09/15/gsm-hacked-go-3g-or-get-snooped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Palm Pre: This Had Better Be Good</title>
		<link>http://minesblog.com/techbreak/2009/01/11/the-palm-pre-this-had-better-be-good/</link>
		<comments>http://minesblog.com/techbreak/2009/01/11/the-palm-pre-this-had-better-be-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Littman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minesblog.com/techbreak/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The belle of the ball at last week&#8217;s Consumer Electronics Show (CES) was Palm&#8217;s Pre, a new smartphone with a new oeprating system, made for rapid development, easy search, and in general a web-connected smartphone experience. All well and good, and I love Palm products, but a few omissions and worries: What&#8217;s the price? If [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The belle of the ball at last week&#8217;s Consumer Electronics Show (CES) was Palm&#8217;s Pre, a new smartphone with a new oeprating system, made for rapid development, easy search, and in general a web-connected smartphone experience. All well and good, and I love Palm products, but a few omissions and worries:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>What&#8217;s the price? </strong>If it&#8217;s too much, nobody buys and Palm dies. On the other hand, there&#8217;s no such thing as too low. Hopefully Palm will price their product at $199, the same as the 8GB iPhone (the Pre has 8GB of internal memory as well). The problem is that the Pre isn&#8217;t an iPhone, and yetPalm may think their product superior enough to price it as high as $399 rumoor has it. $299 might work, $249 maywell be a good price, $199 is great&#8230;but $399? Not to Palm: you may be convinced of your product&#8217;s superiority&#8230;but you&#8217;re not Apple. Customers are the ones who need convincing, and subsidizing your phone heavily is one way to do that.</li>
<li><strong>Where&#8217;s the memory card slot? </strong>That&#8217;s right, looks like the Pre doesn&#8217;t hae one. Granted, neither does the iPhone, and the Pre has a wwhopping 8 GB of internal storage, but still, when all other Palm products have SD or MicroSD cards, why not the Pre?</li>
<li><strong>Is the keyboard decent</strong><strong>?</strong> No, I&#8217;m not talking about a comparison with the iPhone&#8217;s touch screen. More along the lines of the Blackberry or some of HTC&#8217;s mobiles, like my own HTC Mogul. Hopefully Palm made the keyboard better than that of the Centro; the little chiclets on that phone&#8217;s face are just plain hard to type on.</li>
</ol>
<div>That&#8217;s it, three beefs. Otherwise, my nitpicks are either small or nonexistent. Viva la Palm! In English, I want a Pre, stat! In case you&#8217;re wondering, I&#8217;ll review the device as soon as I can; this just might be bigger than the iPhone.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://minesblog.com/techbreak/2009/01/11/the-palm-pre-this-had-better-be-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
